home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
-
-
- ORDER LIST
-
- MONDAY, MAY 24, 1993
-
-
-
- CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION
-
- 92-67 UNITED STATES V. ABREU, ORESTES, ET AL.
-
- The motion of respondent James Thornburgh for leave to
-
- proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ
-
- of certiorari is granted. The judgments are vacated and the
-
- case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals
-
- for the Tenth Circuit for further consideration in light
-
- of Deal v. United States, 508 U. S. (1993).
-
- 92-1442 GARCIA, ADALINE, ET VIR V. UNITED STATES
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for
-
- further consideration in light of Republic National Bank
-
- of Miami v. United States, 506 U. S. (1992).
-
- 92-1452 BOWENS, CHARLIE MAE V. UNITED STATES
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
-
- for further consideration in light of Republic National
-
- Bank of Miami v. United States, 506 U. S. (1992).
-
- 92-1458 ROSALES, ALBERTO V. UNITED STATES
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
-
- for further consideration in light of Ortega-Rodriquez
-
- v. United States, 507 U. S. (1993).
-
-
- ORDERS IN PENDING CASES
-
-
- No. . RICHARD J. KRANTZ V. PHILLIP BRIGGS, SUPERINTENDENT, COOK
- INLET PRETRIAL FACILITY, ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
-
- The motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition
-
- for a writ of certiorari out-of-time is denied.
-
- D-1232 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF LANCE JOSEPH THIBIDEAU
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Lance
-
- Joseph Thibideau, of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, has
-
- resigned from the practice of law before the Supreme
-
- Court of Florida and this Court by order of February 22,
-
- 1993, having suspended the said Lance Joseph Thibideau
-
- from the practice of law in this Court and directed that
-
- a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Lance Joseph Thibideau
-
- be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
-
-
-
-
-
- D-1233 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF KENNETH FRANK IREK
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Kenneth
-
- Frank Irek, of Raleigh, North Carolina, has been
-
- disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court
-
- of North Carolina and this Court by order of February
-
- 22, 1993, having suspended the said Kenneth Frank Irek
-
- from the practice of law in this Court and directed that
-
- a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly
-
- issued;
-
- It is ordered that the said Kenneth Frank Irek be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1237 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ARTHUR J. MATUSOW
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Arthur J.
-
- Matusow, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, has resigned
-
- from the practice of law before the Supreme Court of
-
- Pennsylvania, Eastern District, and this Court by order
-
- of February 22, 1993, having suspended the said Arthur
-
- J. Matusow from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause
-
- why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Arthur J. Matusow be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1240 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF IRA POSTEL
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Ira
-
- Postel, of New York, New York, has been disbarred from
-
- the practice of law by the Appellate Division, Supreme
-
- Court of New York, First Judicial Department, and this
-
- Court by order of March 1, 1993, having suspended the
-
- said Ira Postel from the practice of law in this Court
-
- and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show
-
- cause why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Ira Postel be disbarred
-
- from the practice of law in this Court and that his name
-
- be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to
-
- practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1241 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MICHAEL P. OSHATZ
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Michael
-
- P. Oshatz, of Scarsdale, New York, has been disbarred
-
- from the practice of law by the Appellate Division,
-
- Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department,
-
- and this Court by order of March 1, 1993, having
-
- suspended the said Michael P. Oshatz from the practice
-
- of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue
-
- requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Michael P. Oshatz be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1242 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JERROLD M. FLEISHER
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Jerrold
-
- M. Fleisher, of Closter, New Jersey, has been disbarred
-
- from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of New
-
- Jersey and this Court by order of March 1, 1993, having
-
- suspended the said Jerrold M. Fleisher from the practice
-
- of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue
-
- requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Jerrold M. Fleisher be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1243 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOSEPH A. DAMBACH
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Joseph A.
-
- Dambach, of Fords, New Jersey, has been disbarred from
-
- the practice of law by the Supreme Court of New Jersey
-
- and this Court by order of March 1, 1993, having
-
- suspended the said Joseph A. Dambach from the practice
-
- of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue
-
- requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Joseph A. Dambach be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1244 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF FRANCIS GUTHRIE GORDON, III
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Francis
-
- Guthrie Gordon, III, of Charlottesville, Virginia, has
-
- resigned from the practice of law before the Supreme
-
- Court of Virginia and this Court by order of March 1,
-
- 1993, having suspended the said Francis Guthrie Gordon,
-
- III, from the practice of law in this Court and directed
-
-
-
- that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he
-
- should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Francis Guthrie Gordon,
-
- III, be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court
-
- and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1252 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MELVIN M. LEBETKIN
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Melvin M.
-
- Lebetkin, of Kew Gardens, New York, has been disbarred
-
- from the practice of law by the Appellate Division,
-
- Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department, and
-
- this Court by order of April 5, 1993, having suspended
-
- the said Melvin M. Lebetkin from the practice of law in
-
- this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him
-
- to show cause why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that a response has
-
- been filed;
-
- It is ordered that the said Melvin M. Lebetkin be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
-
-
- D-1267 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF WILLIAM H. MANGER
-
- It is ordered that William H. Manger, of Baltimore,
-
- Maryland, be suspended from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty
-
- days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1268 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF SAM B. DUNFORD
-
- It is ordered that Sam B. Dunford, of Palm Springs,
-
- California, be suspended from the practice of law in
-
- this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1269 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF VIRGIL VICTOR BECKER
-
- It is ordered that Virgil Victor Becker, of
-
- Atascadero, California, be suspended from the practice
-
- of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable
-
- within forty days, requiring him to show cause why he
-
- should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this
-
- Court.
-
- D-1270 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOHN LEWE GUBBINS
-
- It is ordered that John Lewe Gubbins, of Montefort,
-
- Wisconsin, be suspended from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty
-
- days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
-
-
- D-1271 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MICHAEL TIMOTHY BAILEY
-
- It is ordered that Michael Timothy Bailey, of
-
- Portland, Oregon, be suspended from the practice of law
-
- in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- 65, Orig. TEXAS V. NEW MEXICO
-
- The motion of the River Master for approval of fees
-
- and expenses is granted and the River Master is awarded
-
- $370.29 for the period January 1 - March 31, 1993 to be paid
-
- equally by the parties.
-
- 91-1523 FLORENCE CTY. SCH. DIST. V. CARTER, SHANNON
-
- The motion of the Acting Solicitor General for
-
- leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae
-
- and for divided argument is granted.
-
- 92-519) JOHNSON, BOLLEY, ET AL. V. De GRANDY, MIGUEL, ET AL.
- 92-593) De GRANDY, MIGUEL, ET AL. V. JOHNSON, BOLLEY, ET AL.
- 92-767) UNITED STATES V. FLORIDA, ET AL.
-
- The motion of American Jewish Congress, et al. for
-
- leave to file a brief as amici curiae in No. 92-519 is
-
- granted.
-
- 92-757) LANDGRAF, BARBARA V. USI FILM PROD., ET AL.
- 92-938) RIVERS, MAURICE, ET AL. V. ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC.
-
- The motion of the Acting Solicitor General for
-
- leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae
-
- and for divided argument is granted. The motion of
-
- respondents for divided argument is denied.
-
-
-
- 92-989 TENNESSEE V. MIDDLEBROOKS, DONALD
-
- The motion for appointment of counsel is granted
-
- and it is ordered that David C. Stebbins, Esquire,
-
- Nashville, Tennessee, is appointed to serve as counsel
-
- for the respondent Donald Ray Middlebrooks in this case.
-
- 92-1123 IZUMI SEIMITSU KOGYO, ETC. V. U.S. PHILIPS CORP, ET AL.
-
- The motion of Sears, Roebuck & Co. for leave to
-
- file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion of
-
- the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in
-
- oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument
-
- is granted.
-
- 92-1168 HARRIS, TERESA V. FORKLIFT SYSTEMS, INC.
-
- The motion of the Acting Solicitor General for
-
- leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae
-
- and for divided argument is granted.
-
- 92-1223 DEPT. OF DEFENSE, ET AL. V. FLRA, ET AL.
-
- The motion of the Acting Solicitor General to
-
- dispense with printing the joint appendix is granted.
-
-
- CERTIORARI GRANTED
-
-
- 92-1370 BFP V. RTC, RECEIVER OF IMPERIAL
-
- 92-1402 C & A CARBONE, INC., ET AL. V. CLARKSTOWN, NEW YORK
-
- 92-1441 STAPLES, HAROLD V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-1482 WEISS, ERIC V. UNITED STATES
-
- The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted.
-
-
-
- 92-1510 CAVANAUGH, MICHAEL, ET AL. V. ROLLER, GARY LEE
-
- The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of
-
- certiorari is granted.
-
- 92-6921 LITEKY, JOHN PATRICK, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
-
- The motion of petitioners for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari
-
- are granted.
-
-
- CERTIORARI DENIED
-
- 91-8180 GRIMES, TIMOTHY A., ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-1097 BARR, HARRY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-1348 RAPIDES REGIONAL MED. CENTER V. BROWN, SEC. OF VA
-
- 92-1368 BRUNEAU, JACQUELINE V. FDIC
-
- 92-1408 ROGALA, JOHN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-1433 WALLACE, EDWARD, ET AL. V. FDIC
-
- 92-1437 WALLACH, EUGENE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-1533 TEXAS V. McPHERSON, LARRY
-
- 92-1578 KNEDLIK, WILL V. BLUMBERG, JANET
-
- 92-1585 BURCH, ROBERT V. CHATHAM, NEW JERSEY, ET AL.
-
- 92-1588 COMMITTE, BRUCE V. UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT
-
- 92-1592 IOWA COAL MINING CO., ET AL. V. MONROE CTY. BD., ETC., ET AL
-
- 92-1594 NEBRASKA V. CHILDS, STEVEN
-
- 92-1597 MEDRANO, GUADALUPE, ET AL. V. LOS ANGELES, ET AL.
-
- 92-1598 CURLEY, THOMAS V. CONRAIL, ET AL.
-
- 92-1599 BERNDT, MARK V. JACOBI, ERNEST
-
- 92-1600 PARSONS CORP., ET AL. V. ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
-
- 92-1601 LeBLANC, ROLAND V. RAYTHEON COMPANY, INC.
-
- 92-1604 BERGER, SANFORD J., ET AL. V. CUYAHOGA CTY. BAR, ET AL.
-
- 92-1605 WOOSLEY, PATRICK V. CALIFORNIA
-
- 92-1607 GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION V. DRENNAN, JoANN, ET AL.
-
- 92-1608 BOWMAN, LORETTA, ET AL. V. FRANKLIN, WISCONSIN, ET AL.
-
- 92-1654 LEAF, LINDA V. SUPREME CT. OF WI, ET AL.
-
- 92-1686 CAMPOS, NIDIA V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-1707 HICKS, JIMMY, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-5025 BERNIER, JEAN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-5344 FULLER, AARON L. V. TEXAS
-
- 92-5690 HAYHOW, MATTHEW V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-5786 ROULETTE, JAMES E. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-5988 ANDERSON, JOHN A. V. WISCONSIN DEPT. OF REVENUE
-
- 92-6276 PIERETTI, DARRYL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-6832 FRYER, EDDIE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7021 ODLE, THOMAS V. V. ILLINOIS
-
- 92-7660 KIRKLAND, MACK V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7770 JACKSON, EARL L. V. CALIFORNIA
-
- 92-7793 RAMEY, IRVING V. ILLINOIS
-
- 92-7828 BANKS, ANGELO BERNARD V. GREEN, JOHN M., ET AL.
-
- 92-7831 SMITH, DERRICK GEORGE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7920 STALLINGS, LARRY BAXTER V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8038 TAVAKOLI-NOURI, KAMRAN V. CIA
-
- 92-8188 McNEIL, MICHAEL D. V. SAFFLE, REGIONAL DIR., ET AL
-
- 92-8201 JOHNSON, JEROME V. V. GRATERFORD STATE CORR. INST.
-
- 92-8202 FLIEGER, ROBERT V. BOSLEY, FREEMAN R.
-
- 92-8208 COCHRAN, ROBERT MORRIS V. BERGER, BRUCE, ET AL.
-
- 92-8209 COLE, LEO RILEY V. OKLAHOMA, ET AL.
-
- 92-8214 SCOTT, WILLIAM, ET UX. V. O'GRADY, JAMES, ET AL.
-
- 92-8215 WAKEFIELD, ARTHUR V. SAMUELS, ROBERT, ET AL.
-
- 92-8227 VAN WAGNER, GEORGE V. STAMBAUGH, GREGORY, ET AL.
-
- 92-8237 LUCIEN, RUDOLPH L. V. PETERS, DIR., IL DOC, ET AL.
-
- 92-8239 RYMAN, NORMAN WILSON V. GALLEY, JON, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 92-8241 MAYBERRY, M.C. V. HANNIGAN, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 92-8242 MARKHAM, FLOYD D. V. OKLAHOMA
-
- 92-8255 MUHAMMAD, ABDULLAH V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8256 NEWMAN, CLIFFORD T. V. PENNSYLVANIA
-
- 92-8259 DEMPSEY, JOHN V. HARSHBARGER, MA AG
-
- 92-8260 NOBLITT, HORACE LEE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8262 MOREL, KATHRYN E. V. MOREL, RICHARD J.
-
- 92-8263 PACCHETTI, CHARLES L. V. GROOSE, SUPT.
-
- 92-8266 MARKS, WALLACE V. OK TAX COMMISSION
-
- 92-8294 TAYLOR, AARON V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8303 TODARO, CAMILLO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8311 OSHER, FRANCIS V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8339 SWANN, WILLIAM LEE V. SINGLETON, WARDEN
-
- 92-8345 SEATON, PARNELL V. JABE, WARDEN
-
- 92-8352 YOUNG, RICHARD V. PENNSYLVANIA
-
- 92-8364 BEHNEY, SCOTT L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8367 NEVILLE, TODD DAVID V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8370 MILLER, KENNETH ALBERT V. McCORMICK, WARDEN
-
- 92-8371 WEEKLY, LILLIAN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8372 YEPEZ, JOSE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8373 POOLE, ROBERT LEE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8379 TAYLOR, JEAN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8380 DANNA, BARRY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8385 GREEN, STEVEN D. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8386 HERNANDEZ-MARQUEZ, FRANCISCO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8387 KELLEY, DANIEL M. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8388 HARDWICK, JESSIE L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8391 JONES, KEITH R. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8392 JONES, SYLVESTER V. BIDEN, JOSEPH R., ET AL.
-
- 92-8403 CARDENAS, SIXTO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8404 VARAS-SANTOS, GUSTAVO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8406 STINCHCOMB, STANLEY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8407 SCOTT, RUSSELL NEIL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8411 MARTINEZ, RAUL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8413 TRENT, PHYLLIS V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8414 BENNETT, RAY AUSTIN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8416 CALLANAN, EVAN H. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8422 JACKSON, JUAN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8423 ELWELL, DAVID V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8427 SALAS, SAMUEL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8437 POSADA, JERMAN DARIO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8440 PUNO, DAVID V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8441 OROZCO, ENRIQUE L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8442 RICKS, EDWARD V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8443 OLUFIDIPE, SOLOMON V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8445 McINTOSH, BILLY, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8447 FOSTER, WALTER R. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8454 ZEMAN, ROBERT V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-8467 GRAHAM, GARY V. TEXAS
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
-
- 92-1516 MAGNESIUM ELEKTRON, INC. V. PUB. INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP
-
- The motion of Washington Legal Foundation for leave
-
- to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion
-
- of Chemical Industry Council of New Jersey, et al. for
-
- leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The
-
- petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
-
- 92-1587 MICHIGAN V. DAVIS, HARRIET
-
- The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of
-
- certiorari is denied.
-
- 92-1656 FACEMIRE, RALPH V. LIBERTY SAVINGS BANK, ET AL.
-
- The motion of petitioner to strike brief in
-
- opposition is denied. The petition for a writ of
-
- certiorari is denied.
-
- 92-8224 RAMSEUR, THOMAS C. V. BEYER, SUPT., ET AL.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
-
- Justice Kennedy would grant certiorari.
-
- 92-8429 CASTANEDA, JOSE V. UNITED STATES
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
-
- Justice Stevens took no part in the consideration or
-
- decision of this petition.
-
-
-
-
- HABEAS CORPUS DENIED
-
-
- 92-8470 IN RE SYLVESTER ZIEBARTH
-
- 92-8542 IN RE JOHN LAPINSKI
-
- The petitions for writs of habeas corpus are
-
- denied.
-
- MANDAMUS DENIED
-
-
- 92-1603 IN RE EDWARD RONWIN
-
- 92-7983 IN RE PAUL FAZZINI
-
- 92-8134 IN RE MICHAEL B. FORTE
-
- The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.
-
- 92-1350 IN RE GEORGE L. PARKER
-
- 92-1447 IN RE NORMAN MOSCOWITZ
-
- The motions of respondent John Demjanjuk for leave
-
- to proceed in forma pauperis are granted. The petitions
-
- for writs of mandamus and/or prohibition are denied.
-
-
- REHEARINGS DENIED
-
-
- 92-1387 McNUTT, NANCY V. GTE FL, INC.
-
- 92-1409 GACKENBACH, MYRON V. UNIROYAL, INC.
-
- 92-7385 HARGROVE, STARLIN T. V. MORRIS, WARDEN
-
- 92-7489 WILLIAMS, PAUL V. WHITLEY, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 92-7563 HEIMBAUGH, ROBERT A. V. SAN FRANCISCO, ET AL.
-
- 92-7596 HINES, BARBARA A. V. VANDERBILT UNIV., ET AL.
-
- 92-7619 IN RE ANDREW SEARCY
-
- 92-7701 HOOPER, MICHAEL V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
-
- 92-7740 WILLIAMS, WILLIE LEE V. COLLINS, DIR., TX DCJ
-
- 92-7748 HELZER, RICHARD L. V. MICHIGAN
-
- 92-7799 NETELKOS, CHRISTOS V. UNITED STATES
-
- 92-7818 MENDEZ, RAPHAEL V. FCI, BUTNER, NC, ET AL.
-
- 92-7904 IN RE W. J. GRAY
-
- The petitions for rehearing are denied.
-
- 92-1083 PHELPS, ZIBA V. SOVRAN BANK
-
- The petition for rehearing is denied. The Chief
-
- Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of
-
- this petition.
-
- 92-6878 BURTON, ROBERT A. V. CITY OF YOUNGSTOWN, ET AL.
-
- The motion for leave to file a petition for
-
- rehearing is denied.
-
-
- RECESS ORDER
-
- This Court will take a recess from Monday, May 24, 1993
-
- until Tuesday, June 1, 1993.
-
-
- MOTIONS FOR ADMISSION
-
- The written motions for admission of the following
-
- lawyers to the Bar of this Court are granted:
-
-
-
-
-
-